Resource Criteria

This DiversityDiversity Differences among people with respect to age, socio-economic status, ethnicity, gender, physical and mental ability, race, sexual orientation, spiritual practices, and other human differences (Deen, Huskey & Parker, 2015)., EquityEquity Equity refers to the policies, practices, attitudes, and cultural messages that are representative of all members of society, such that each member has access to resources that eliminate differential outcomes by group identity (Niblett, 2017). and InclusionInclusion A state of being valued, respected and supported. Inclusion authentically puts the concept and practice of diversity into action by creating an equitable environment where the richness of ideas, backgrounds, and perspectives are harnessed (Hudson, 2011; Baltimore Racial Justice, 2016).  repository provides easy to access resources to improve Extension professionals’ awareness, knowledge and skills to engage with diverse populations in organizations and/or with clientele. This is a participatory library where Extension professionals can share programs and resources that support DEIDEI DEI stands for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion, which refers to a set of principles, practices, and policies that promote and value differences in race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, ability, and other characteristics, while striving to create fair and equitable opportunities and outcomes for all individuals (Gill et al., 2018). efforts. Use these resources to share curricula, training and other publications, which support the learning, information-generating, and planning purposes of the DEI framework and competencies. Similarly, you can search the library for information, tools and resources to use in your own work. For details on how to submit a resource, check the tab Suggest a Resource.

The Content Review Criteria provides guidance for anyone intending to add resources to the DEI Extension repository. We encourage you to consider the source credibility, author consent, the timeliness of the resource, if it is evidence informed and community centered, and to what extent it is aligned with diversity, equity, inclusion values and practices. Expanded definitions of each criteria are included below.

The resource submission must meet all 5 criteria for inclusion.
Criteria 1:  Source Credibility

STANDARDS:

  • Is the resource from a Land Grant University?
  • Do authors or collaborators have expertise in the appropriate areas explored by the content?
Y/N
Criteria 2:  Resource Framework

STANDARDS:

  • Does the resource use inclusive and people centered language consistently?
  • Is the educational resource centered in the community/audience and prioritizes diversity, equity, inclusion, and access?
  • Is the resource readily available and accessible to diverse audiences (e.g. for people with sensory or cognitive disabilities)?
  • Is the intent and impact of the resource centered on education and/or growth?
 
Criteria 3: Evidence

STANDARDS:

  • Is the content grounded in reputable academics?
  • Does the content demonstrate inclusivity?
  • Does the resource utilize a strength based and needs based perspective and process?
 
Criteria 4: Timeliness

STANDARDS:

  • Has this resource been published/developed within the last 10-20 years?
  • If not published recently, is the material foundation or “evergreen” in that it is still currently applicable and useful?
  • Is the language and content grounded in currently acceptable best practices?

Criteria 5: Suitability

STANDARDS:

  • Overall, is the resource suitable for inclusion in a database focused on diversity, equity, inclusion, and access?
  • Does the resource avoid an “expert model” approach, especially ones that exclude marginalized audiences?
  • Does the source exclude content that could result in harm or oppression against a marginalized audience (i.e. LGTBQ conversion therapy)?
  • Does the content align with the LGU/CES organizational values of being intersectional, trauma-informed, demonstrating a commitment to DEI&A, and following sound academic principles?